Justice Surya Kant on Technology's Role in Justice

KANDY, SRI LANKA – The Senior-most Supreme Court judge, Justice Surya Kant, has emphasized that while technology is transforming the legal landscape, the essence of justice remains inherently human. During his address at the 29th National Law Conference in Kandy, Justice Kant remarked that innovations like AI and digital services serve as valuable tools for the judiciary, but cannot substitute the human empathy and insight necessary for fair trials.

“Technology can be a strong partner, yet justice will always be deeply human,” stated Justice Kant. He pointed out that courts previously defined by stacks of paper now utilize dashboards that provide real-time updates on case filings, pendency, and schedules.

Justice Kant acknowledged that AI can aid in legal research, document preparation, and identifying discrepancies, yet it lacks the ability to interpret the nuanced emotional signals of witnesses and the gravitas of legal decisions. “Let technology provide guidance while human judgment prevails,” he cautioned, advocating against excessive dependence on algorithms for making crucial decisions.

He described the ongoing evolution of the legal system as both global and extensive, mentioning that case management tools, electronic filing systems, and remote hearings are broadening access to justice beyond conventional bounds. Courts across India have already embraced online dispute resolution, virtual hearings, and electronic registries, enhancing the efficiency and transparency of the judicial process.

Justice Kant noted that technology serves as a vital resource for students and young legal practitioners, which facilitates deeper connections with case law, expedites research, and enhances understanding of procedural requirements. Likewise, citizens benefit from digital grievance platforms, virtual Lok Adalats, and online legal assistance, making the pursuit of justice more reachable than ever.

However, he reiterated the necessity for caution. While data can guide decisions, it should not be the sole arbiter. Legal professionals must ensure technology nurtures transparency, fairness, and accountability. Justice Kant highlighted risks like AI inaccuracies, data biases, and confidentiality issues, reaffirming that human oversight is paramount.

Advocating for inclusivity, he called for equitable access to legal technology, urging that it should not be confined to the elite. Law schools and legal institutes should integrate courses addressing legal informatics, AI ethics, data science, and computational law to better prepare future legal professionals.

In conclusion, Justice Surya Kant expressed a vision of balance: embracing technology to enhance justice without undermining fundamental principles of fairness, due process, and human dignity. “We can shape and manage technology to ensure it reinforces, rather than replaces, justice,” he affirmed.

This view supports a future where courts are transparent, more accessible, and effective while remaining anchored by human insight, compassion, and ethical standards.